The work Part I - Fluktuierendes Geflüster unfolds as a fragile and vulnerable soundscape of whispers. They form a multichannel “choir” that moves into more defined moments of highly intensified expressions where the polyrhythmic and musical qualities of the impalpable voices engage and collapse with the majestic and diffusing acoustics of the great reverberant hall. The piece is constantly co-created by the listeners’ physical movement and attention in relation to the sound sources. Part I - Fluktuierendes Geflüster is in context with Alexander Tillegreen’s ongoing work with the phantom word illusion and is his first psychoacoustic work with whispering as a leading motive and material.
The whispering words ebb and flow between the comprehendible and impalpable. In spurts of formations, they disperse into the hall and materialize into massive blocks. In the next moment, they suddenly fade away. The whispering voices are blurred, and identity markers such as gender, age, and health, usually present in the human voice, have disappeared. Whispering may carry associations of the secretive or the intimate. As a social and communicative tool, whispering can be aimed to include a single listener while excluding others.
The acoustics and architecture have changed drastically from the main hall to the smaller cabinets. Here the voice is raised from what before was a whispering stage to a more erect and defined stage of speech. More voice characteristics seem to unfold but are still in a blur.
First, in cabinet one, the listener is presented with a more dry and systematic demonstration of the phantom word illusion. A simple panning is initially used to illustrate the original word (“water”) that then soon is “phantomized” into the simple stereo speaker setup. When composing the illusion, a two-syllable word is fractured and played through several loudspeakers in rhythmic displacements. The phantom word illusion is conditionally linked to the listener’s personal life. The listener’s situation forms the inner streams of words in the meeting with phantom words. Culture, language background, gender, and social experience are defining factors. Furthermore, the listener’s bodily movement and engagement in the space can alter the inner word stream. In this way, the listener becomes a co-creator. The gender of the voice also may become difficult to decipher, and often it is also the case that the listener may experience a blurry state and multiplicity of voices coming from each loudspeaker.
In the second cabinet, the work continues with a deconstructed and multilayered use of the phantom word illusion. Having the word “vælge” (Danish for “choose”) as the starting point of the departure, several layers of illusion are multiplied at different speeds and at different pitches, which in a short time accumulates to a mass of phantom word illusions.
The third and final part of the cycle is also a return to the main hall, marking an architectural loop in the building and the structure of the entire composition.
The word "Augen" ("eyes" in German) introduces this final piece. This phantom word illusion was originally used as scientific stimuli in one of the interdisciplinary studies that Alexander Tillegreen conducted with scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, and it has generated many multilingual meanings for participants over the course of the study. It performs as the baritone backbone of the composition while it is soon accompanied by several singing voices forming a choir. Gradually sighs, stuttering outbursts, moans and groans, and other respiratory paralinguistic sounds are introduced until an accumulative cacophony is held within a few moments. A gentle group of vibrating voices phases out the cycle.
While some of the paintings are reminiscent of drawings, dry and simple in their lines, other works are more painterly and tactile. In Central vibrato voice for Augen (multi directionality), the paint has soaked into the unstretched canvas, and like a singing vibrato voice, it seems both ethereal and strong.
The work Spatio-temporal score (Augen + choir) consists of an elongated, gray frieze-like format. The purple linework seem to refer to the building’s architecture and perhaps the remembrance of the parkour itself.
Finally, in the works Hidden structure (diffusion) and Reverberation (Großer Saal II), spatial and geometrical forms materialize and create a sense of acoustic awareness.
A part of Alexander Tillegreen’s practice is to create dialogues with artists’ works he finds himself connected to. The Brazilian artist Mary Vieira worked with co-creational principles - an idea that Alexander Tillegreen continuously circles when composing his sound installations where the listener often takes part in finishing the work. Correspondence (before thought) is based on archival interview material where Mary Vieira speaks of cosmic forces, natural coherency, and her thoughts on co-creation:
“A person from the audience is necessary, someone simple or educated. People need to participate to finish the work, the conditions are already there.”
Mary Vieira’s voice is rhythmic and energetic. The artwork can be perceived as an intimate dialogue between two artists, suspended in time, reflecting on common themes.
The work Part I - Fluktuierendes Geflüster unfolds as a fragile and vulnerable soundscape of whispers. They form a multichannel “choir” that moves into more defined moments of highly intensified expressions where the polyrhythmic and musical qualities of the impalpable voices engage and collapse with the majestic and diffusing acoustics of the great reverberant hall. The piece is constantly co-created by the listeners’ physical movement and attention in relation to the sound sources. Part I - Fluktuierendes Geflüster is in context with Alexander Tillegreen’s ongoing work with the phantom word illusion and is his first psychoacoustic work with whispering as a leading motive and material.
The whispering words ebb and flow between the comprehendible and impalpable. In spurts of formations, they disperse into the hall and materialize into massive blocks. In the next moment, they suddenly fade away. The whispering voices are blurred, and identity markers such as gender, age, and health, usually present in the human voice, have disappeared. Whispering may carry associations of the secretive or the intimate. As a social and communicative tool, whispering can be aimed to include a single listener while excluding others.
The acoustics and architecture have changed drastically from the main hall to the smaller cabinets. Here the voice is raised from what before was a whispering stage to a more erect and defined stage of speech. More voice characteristics seem to unfold but are still in a blur.
First, in cabinet one, the listener is presented with a more dry and systematic demonstration of the phantom word illusion. A simple panning is initially used to illustrate the original word (“water”) that then soon is “phantomized” into the simple stereo speaker setup. When composing the illusion, a two-syllable word is fractured and played through several loudspeakers in rhythmic displacements. The phantom word illusion is conditionally linked to the listener’s personal life. The listener’s situation forms the inner streams of words in the meeting with phantom words. Culture, language background, gender, and social experience are defining factors. Furthermore, the listener’s bodily movement and engagement in the space can alter the inner word stream. In this way, the listener becomes a co-creator. The gender of the voice also may become difficult to decipher, and often it is also the case that the listener may experience a blurry state and multiplicity of voices coming from each loudspeaker.
In the second cabinet, the work continues with a deconstructed and multilayered use of the phantom word illusion. Having the word “vælge” (Danish for “choose”) as the starting point of the departure, several layers of illusion are multiplied at different speeds and at different pitches, which in a short time accumulates to a mass of phantom word illusions.
The third and final part of the cycle is also a return to the main hall, marking an architectural loop in the building and the structure of the entire composition.
The word "Augen" ("eyes" in German) introduces this final piece. This phantom word illusion was originally used as scientific stimuli in one of the interdisciplinary studies that Alexander Tillegreen conducted with scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, and it has generated many multilingual meanings for participants over the course of the study. It performs as the baritone backbone of the composition while it is soon accompanied by several singing voices forming a choir. Gradually sighs, stuttering outbursts, moans and groans, and other respiratory paralinguistic sounds are introduced until an accumulative cacophony is held within a few moments. A gentle group of vibrating voices phases out the cycle.
While some of the paintings are reminiscent of drawings, dry and simple in their lines, other works are more painterly and tactile. In Central vibrato voice for Augen (multi directionality), the paint has soaked into the unstretched canvas, and like a singing vibrato voice, it seems both ethereal and strong.
The work Spatio-temporal score (Augen + choir) consists of an elongated, gray frieze-like format. The purple linework seem to refer to the building’s architecture and perhaps the remembrance of the parkour itself.
Finally, in the works Hidden structure (diffusion) and Reverberation (Großer Saal II), spatial and geometrical forms materialize and create a sense of acoustic awareness.
A part of Alexander Tillegreen’s practice is to create dialogues with artists’ works he finds himself connected to. The Brazilian artist Mary Vieira worked with co-creational principles - an idea that Alexander Tillegreen continuously circles when composing his sound installations where the listener often takes part in finishing the work. Correspondence (before thought) is based on archival interview material where Mary Vieira speaks of cosmic forces, natural coherency, and her thoughts on co-creation:
“A person from the audience is necessary, someone simple or educated. People need to participate to finish the work, the conditions are already there.”
Mary Vieira’s voice is rhythmic and energetic. The artwork can be perceived as an intimate dialogue between two artists, suspended in time, reflecting on common themes.